What we are doing.
The George Wright Society recognizes that holding an international face-to-face meeting, where most attendees will travel by air, brings with it many environmental impacts. The energy expended to bring 1,000 people from around the USA (and beyond) to a single location is significant, and of course with that energy expenditure comes emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases, as well as pollutants of other kinds. And the environmental impacts of running a conference hotel or convention center are also very significant.
Should environmental organizations even be holding large in-person conferences any longer? It's a valid question. Our position is that face-to-face meetings enable unique and irreplaceable personal dynamics that cannot be provided by video teleconferences, webinars, etc.
This could change, however. In a really interesting article on breaking the flying addiction, journalist Elisabeth Rosenthal suggests that the next generation of leaders, which is now emerging from college and grad school, is more and more comfortable with video teleconferencing, and the technology is improving to the point that genuine interactions seem possible.
That's still in the future; for now, what seems to make sense for our organization is to plan our conferences around several principles:
Regarding the last point, GWS is working on several fronts:
Paperless communications. We have designed our conference management system to be as paperless as possible. Our registration process is 100% web-based, and virtually all of our routine correspondence with registrants is via e-mail (the exception being certain hard-copy receipts we mail out). We print only one hard copy of all abstracts received, and this is shared by the Conference Committee in their selection meetings. Beginning with GWS2011, we are going to an e-book format for the conference proceedings, eliminating the production of several hundred paperback books.
Use of recycled materials. Whenever we do produce paper materials, they are printed on stock made from at least 50% recycled fibers. (The portion of this 50% figure that is made from post-consumer fiber varies.) Similarly, wherever possible we choose packing and shipping materials, and conference giveaways (such as folders), that are made from recycled materials.
Minimizing food/beverage disposables. In our Request for Proposals (RFPs) to hotels, we specify that refreshment breaks be served on china wherever possible.
Water/energy conservation (towel and linen re-use). Most hotels now have a program in which guests can specify that their towels and bed linens not be changed; we insist upon it in our RFPs. All new hotels have low-flush toilets installed; most also have water-saving showerheads and other fixtures, and energy-efficient lighting (e.g., compact fluorescent bulbs).
On-site recycling. The GWS has always made an extra effort to recycle as much as possible at our conferences, and to encourage the hotel staff in all departments — from sales to housekeeping — to do the same. In our experience, all conference hotels claim that they recycle extensively. However, from our personal observations (you can learn a lot by hanging around the “back of the house” service areas and loading docks), the reality is that a lot of potentially recyclable material ends up being discarded.
We try to impress upon hotel staff that recycling and other green practices are a serious matter to us, but when all is said and done we in the GWS can only control a small portion of the recyclables stream. At our registration area we provide a bin for recycling office paper (we take the contents home with us and recycle it there, or else personally see that it goes into the recycling stream at the hotel), and also urge registrants to recycle name tags and holders with us; we then re-use the lanyards and holders.
What you can do.
Once you've decided to attend GWS2011, here are some things you can do to reduce your carbon footprint on your trip.
A note on carbon offsets.
The pros and cons of carbon offsets as a way to address the impacts of conference-related travel — especially air travel — are still being debated. An October 2007 article in Science titled "Greening the Meeting" took on the question of the carbon footprint of scientific meetings. The main points that emerged were: (1) Videoconference alternatives to traditional meetings are at best only a partial solution, (2) offset programs have to be committed to maintaining the investment over a long period — whether it be making sure tree plantations are cared for, PV systems are maintained, or whatever — hence the rise in offset-certification schemes, and (3) some environmentalists think the concept is so plagued by flaws that it amounts to little more than greenwashing ... and it saps the will to conserve more and consume less.
The article referenced above on breaking the flying addiction also makes the point that offsets will realistically never be able to match the huge carbon impacts of flying.
The GWS Board has considered offsets for some years now, but in the absence of clear benefits our approach is to let individual participants decide for themselves whether to use an existing offset program. You can find one directory of such programs here.
The issue is not closed, however, and so if you have an opinion on whether (and how) to do carbon offsets for future GWS conferences, we'd like to hear from you.